camassiabanner.gif

March 26, 2009

There goes the neighborhood

Filed under: Personal stuff — Camassia @ 8:36 pm

So … I decided to stay in D.C., at least for the time being. When I mentioned this to Wess recently he responded, “I’d like to hear more about your decision,” but I’ve been suffering a sort of writer’s block about it. I didn’t really want to announce anything until I’d nailed down an apartment, but I signed a lease on Monday for a place in Adams Morgan, which I will move into in a couple weeks. But also, I’m just not quite sure how to explain. L.A. just seemed like such a hostile environment that it was hard to believe how long I lived there. The only draw was the people, and the people are themselves so transient — Wess himself, after all, is about to leave, as are a few other significant people in my life.

Leaving my grandparents’ house for good is rather sad, but I’m looking forward to having my own place again. It’s hard to believe it’s been almost a year since I had a place all to myself. Theoretically I’ve been living alone here since November, but the house has really been a sort of communal property for a constant stream of relatives, who’ve brought in and taken out and rearranged things as they saw fit. (I still don’t know why I wound up with four jars of peanut butter.) I like the company, but it will be nice to have more control over things.

But once again I will be very busy for a while yet, so posting will be light.

March 10, 2009

The view from the porch

Filed under: Personal stuff — Camassia @ 10:45 pm

I am lying on the daybed in the sunroom in a house in Urban Village, a street in Pasadena that has been half taken over by Mennonites forming an “intentional community.” Some friends from PMC are graciously hosting me this week while I figure out what to do with my life.

A group of bloggers recently launched a site called The Front Porch Republic, explaining the social significance of the front porch as, “where we can both see our neighbors and be seen by them, speak and listen to one another, and, above all, be in a place between (the public and private worlds), but firmly in place.” I think I like this sunroom so much because it’s sort of a front porch for introverts. It juts out of the front of the house with windows on three sides, where I can see the sky, the grand shade trees on the sidewalk, and pedestrians going by, many of whom I know. If only life in SoCal were always like this, I’d be back in a heartbeat.

Mostly, though, being back here has brought home to me just how much I dislike the built environment of L.A. I already knew I disliked it, but the force of it has surprised me a little. Ten years ago when I was getting my journalism degree at Stanford, we students test-drove our reporting skills by covering local Palo Alto issues, and one of the biggest issues of the time was dot-com millionaires building McMansions. We were visited by both a neighborhood association member extolling the benefits of preserving front porches (among other things) and also by a young property owner advocating the right of homeowners to build what they liked. As I remember it, we students were more sympathetic to him, probably because as nascent careerists ourselves we identified more with young dot-com millionaires than with middle-age folks sitting on wildly appreciated properties and closing the door behind them. In fact, when I moved to L.A. shortly thereafter, I was so sick of those quarrels — some folks tried to declare a freaking Lucky store a historic landmark! — that L.A.’s flagrant disinterest in quaint beauty was sort of refreshing.

But living in the radically different built environment of Washington, and then coming back to L.A., makes me a bit more sympathetic to the neighborhood associations. When I lived here, I used to try to make myself walk places rather than drive, but somehow, despite the mild climate, walking in L.A. was never as pleasant as walking in Washington. I’m not sure why that is, but I wonder if it’s a sort of herd instinct. In Washington there are usually lots of other pedestrians on the sidewalks, so even though there are a zillion cars, there’s a sort of feeling that they coexist as equals, like zebra and wildebeest grazing on the same plain. In L.A. the cars are so dominant that you feel more like you’re walking along the edge of a hostile alien environment, like the rim of a volcano.

The fact that my employer is housed in an office park on the edge of nowhere means that this week I have one of the worst commutes known to man: from one side of L.A. through the middle of downtown and out the other side. I rented a car for the purpose, and man, it sure reminds me of how I don’t miss driving. Most Americans seem to be in denial about how dangerous cars are, but I can feel how dangerous they are; when I reach my destination, my jaw aches and this evening my hands were even shaking. I think I had sort of accepted the stress as part of life, but now I am less inclined to put up with it.

On a completely different note, staying here is also reviving my reciprocity issues. I’ve somewhat belatedly realized that this business of coming back here to test the waters has again made me a potential ingrate: if I go back to Washington, I would seem to be rejecting people who have extended yet more hospitality to me. At my mother’s urging, I offered payment to anyone who would put me up for the week, but one party that offered explicitly rejected payment while the one that I wound up staying with hasn’t brought it up. My mother is telling me to push the issue, but my experience with Mennonites makes me wonder if that is itself a faux pas — after all, hospitality is part of their ethic. I don’t know, what do you all think? I don’t really trust my instincts on these matters.

March 2, 2009

Through an LED screen darkly

Filed under: Uncategorized — Camassia @ 8:13 pm

Lee pointed me to this essay by a professor admitting to his ambivalent feelings about snapshot-taking. He pointed out that I had made some similar comments myself not too long ago.

It’s true that on my road trip, I was often surrounded by people taking pictures, while I didn’t even take a camera. Coincidentally, I also went to a monastery (more on that later, I hope), and felt the cameras to be almost profane in the context. But I started noticing my own oddness in that regard a long time earlier.

I was really surprised by the apparently pent-up demand for photography that got unleashed by the rise of cheap digital cameras. A couple years ago I went to the Aquarium of the Pacific in Long Beach, which I had visited many times since moving to L.A., and yet I had never before seen so many cameras around. When I was growing up, of course, you couldn’t take pictures in an aquarium — it was too dark. But it had never even occurred to me to want to.

It was then that the picture craze first started to annoy me. People taking pictures in a crowded place are much more intrusive than people who are simply looking at things in a crowded place. They bob and weave to get a good angle, they pose their friends in front of things, and so on. And what of the fish? I remember being behind a woman for a while who moved from tank to tank, looking at them through her tiny LED screen but never seeming to look directly into the water.

On the other hand, I sometimes argue to myself that I shouldn’t be so annoyed. I do enjoy browsing through the photo albums that my mother put together of our lives, even though at the time I often felt her picture-taking as an unwelcome intrusion into some fun thing we were doing. And I also know that I rely on words to communicate, and a lot of people are more visual than verbal. I completely failed to understand the point of camera phones when they first came out, but I’ve come to see that images can be communicative acts, as well as simply mementos. If you’re seeking unmediated experience, the business of constantly framing things for photos isn’t really any worse than my continual habit if writing down experiences in my head (or on the blog). I guess it’s just tough for human beings to experience anything without thinking of how you’d tell it to someone else.

I also understand, having stood before scenes of awesome natural beauty, the desire to do something in response to it. I suppose for the mystically inclined there’s genuflection and praise, but for the more prosaic, there’s taking a snapshot. We take pictures of special things, after all, and maybe taking a photo is a way of saying to the mountain or the waterfall just how special they are.

I do wonder, though, if the sheer abundance of photography these days will take away from that specialness, and the craze will die down. For one thing, what do you do with all those pictures? Everyone who likes to take pictures seems to have a digital backlog that they haven’t had time to look at or sort through, which rather takes away from the idea that you take pictures to remember things. Maybe someday, the sign of a really special event will be that it’s unphotographed — an experience for only the lucky few who were there.

Powered by WordPress